You say you focus on technical research. Specifically, you focus in microeconomic (incl. game theory and decision theory) and computer science research. I read that you have a cognitive scientists too. Though, I have yet to see a single unit of cog-sci research output.
Cognitive architectures are generally agreed upon as thefrontier to overcome to achieve human level intelligence, let alone superhuman intelligence:
Nick Bostrom asked leading researchers in the field of Ai to pick which technology provides the most promising path to human-level intelligence. The most popular answer was cognitive science. However, the second most popular answer was Integrated Cognitive Architectures.
This may not be such a problem:
Rationality material on LW approximates a lay hypothesis generation for GOMS.
Some reinforcement learning) cognitive architectures approximate the computer science research you do in anycase.
But that the fact that what you communicate doesn’t closely match what I infer suggests something or the other is sub-optimal.
You say you focus on technical research. Specifically, you focus in microeconomic (incl. game theory and decision theory) and computer science research. I read that you have a cognitive scientists too. Though, I have yet to see a single unit of cog-sci research output.
Cognitive architectures are generally agreed upon as the frontier to overcome to achieve human level intelligence, let alone superhuman intelligence:
This may not be such a problem:
Rationality material on LW approximates a lay hypothesis generation for GOMS.
Some reinforcement learning) cognitive architectures approximate the computer science research you do in anycase.
But that the fact that what you communicate doesn’t closely match what I infer suggests something or the other is sub-optimal.