By the OP’s definition of ‘advanced wisdom’, all advanced wisdom looks like bullshit, by definition.
That (re)definition makes Shalmanese’s third law tautological rather than clearly false. That’s fine, so long as no attempt is made to draw any conclusions about, well, actual advanced wisdom.
That (re)definition makes Shalmanese’s third law tautological rather than clearly false. That’s fine, so long as no attempt is made to draw any conclusions about, well, actual advanced wisdom.