There are plenty of deep problems left, but no completely new and useful frameworks.
I question the framing of this assertion. It seems like a lot of LW wisdom about Bayes’ Theorem doesn’t come from a general understanding of statistics, so much as a deep understanding of Bayes’ theorem.
That is to say that while you get some super awesome ideas from frameworks, a lot of the coolness after that comes from a deep understanding of specific details.
I question the framing of this assertion. It seems like a lot of LW wisdom about Bayes’ Theorem doesn’t come from a general understanding of statistics, so much as a deep understanding of Bayes’ theorem.
That is to say that while you get some super awesome ideas from frameworks, a lot of the coolness after that comes from a deep understanding of specific details.