Since I haven’t gotten any suggestions yet, here are some of my collected favorites, all with flaws:
Parahuman AGI—Loosely invokes being like-but-different-than humans, and working alongside humans. Still too vague, but I just can’t find any brief terminology.
REAL AGI—Reflexive Entity with Agency and Learning that is Artificially Generally Intelligenct. Grammatically clumsy.
Self Aware AGI—Captures one central bit, vaguely implies agency. Leaves out the rest.
Sapient AI—Invokes similarity to Homo Sapiens. I wrote about this concept and terminology in Sapience, understanding, and “AGI”. Now I think it’s too vague. Perhaps “silico sapiens” but that sounds so forced and silly.
Universal AI—Technically exactly how I’m defining it, but sounds like it’s implying that it understands everything already, rather than being able to learn about and thereby think about anything.
Sentient AI—The vague etymology is worse than sapient, but it’s in more common usage. It historically leans more toward feeling where sapient leans more toward understanding, but they’re both used in vague and conflicting ways and don’t have clean etymologies.
Artificial Fully General Intelligence—More or less the definition I’ve taken AGI to have, but doesn’t intuitively imply the important stuff like goal-directed agency and contextual awareness.
Artificial Individuals—Captures the right intuitions but abbreviates right back to AI.
Intelligent Artificial Minds—Seems to capture the right intuitions, and I like the implications of the abbreviation IAM.
Since I haven’t gotten any suggestions yet, here are some of my collected favorites, all with flaws:
Parahuman AGI—Loosely invokes being like-but-different-than humans, and working alongside humans. Still too vague, but I just can’t find any brief terminology.
REAL AGI—Reflexive Entity with Agency and Learning that is Artificially Generally Intelligenct. Grammatically clumsy.
Self Aware AGI—Captures one central bit, vaguely implies agency. Leaves out the rest.
Sapient AI—Invokes similarity to Homo Sapiens. I wrote about this concept and terminology in Sapience, understanding, and “AGI”. Now I think it’s too vague. Perhaps “silico sapiens” but that sounds so forced and silly.
Universal AI—Technically exactly how I’m defining it, but sounds like it’s implying that it understands everything already, rather than being able to learn about and thereby think about anything.
Sentient AI—The vague etymology is worse than sapient, but it’s in more common usage. It historically leans more toward feeling where sapient leans more toward understanding, but they’re both used in vague and conflicting ways and don’t have clean etymologies.
Artificial Fully General Intelligence—More or less the definition I’ve taken AGI to have, but doesn’t intuitively imply the important stuff like goal-directed agency and contextual awareness.
Artificial Individuals—Captures the right intuitions but abbreviates right back to AI.
Intelligent Artificial Minds—Seems to capture the right intuitions, and I like the implications of the abbreviation IAM.
Synthetic Entities or Artificial entities also came to mind.