I don’t know what exactly panpsychicms holds (which is part of the reason why I have isms). But if one understands it as “everything materic has experiences” then there is a somewhat natural foil of “everything that experiences has physicality” (“panphysicalism”). With “only” panpsychisms its left open whether there is something that is experience only but is not physical.
Well, with a clause that causality/laws could be formulated differently. A dual aspecter would be very reluctant to equate “physics” with “the territory”.
Well now I’ve finally got what Dual Aspect Neutral Monism is—it’s just panpyschism with “physics can be formulated differently” observation!
I don’t know what exactly panpsychicms holds (which is part of the reason why I have isms). But if one understands it as “everything materic has experiences” then there is a somewhat natural foil of “everything that experiences has physicality” (“panphysicalism”). With “only” panpsychisms its left open whether there is something that is experience only but is not physical.
Well, with a clause that causality/laws could be formulated differently. A dual aspecter would be very reluctant to equate “physics” with “the territory”.