I didn’t downvote it, and was disappointed when I looked at it and it appear to have been downvoted simply for being wrong. My impression at the time was that the author was thinking sloppily, and was insisting on continuing the same pattern of thought despite corrective comments.
It appears to have been removed, so I can’t go back and check my assumptions.
In my view, the only reason for downvoting something so far would be if it were completely off topic or the poster were aggressively insulting other users.
I didn’t downvote it, and was disappointed when I looked at it and it appear to have been downvoted simply for being wrong. My impression at the time was that the author was thinking sloppily, and was insisting on continuing the same pattern of thought despite corrective comments.
It appears to have been removed, so I can’t go back and check my assumptions.
In my view, the only reason for downvoting something so far would be if it were completely off topic or the poster were aggressively insulting other users.
Thank you, Gavin