I’ve not read much in this area and have not even tried to follow through on the references provided in the OP. I’m open to being told I should have as some directly address my comment.
I think the big question to ask here, if one is advocating expanding the “socialist firm” (quotes since that can refer to a number of somewhat different structures) is conditions in which those forms are superior to the normal corporate structure. In other words, given all these forms exist in the current economic landscape the claim seems to be that we’re out of equilibrium and marginal adjustments will produce a better equilibrium position.
I’ve not read much in this area and have not even tried to follow through on the references provided in the OP. I’m open to being told I should have as some directly address my comment.
I think the big question to ask here, if one is advocating expanding the “socialist firm” (quotes since that can refer to a number of somewhat different structures) is conditions in which those forms are superior to the normal corporate structure. In other words, given all these forms exist in the current economic landscape the claim seems to be that we’re out of equilibrium and marginal adjustments will produce a better equilibrium position.