I naturally take a stance against abortion. It’s easy to see why: a woman’s freedom is much more important than another human’s right to live.
I think this is backwards?
If you haven’t already, consider reading Judith Jarvis Thomson’s “A Defense of Abortion”, the core thread of which intuition-pumps the reader to the following effect: even if a fetus were granted the full moral status of a conscious, innocent, adult human, it would not be impermissible for an unwilling incubator to kill it to get it out of her.
I don’t think clearly-marked intuition pumps are automatically Dark Arts, although if they involve a lot of emotional language they can overlap. Thomson rambles but doesn’t cheat.
I think this is backwards?
If you haven’t already, consider reading Judith Jarvis Thomson’s “A Defense of Abortion”, the core thread of which intuition-pumps the reader to the following effect: even if a fetus were granted the full moral status of a conscious, innocent, adult human, it would not be impermissible for an unwilling incubator to kill it to get it out of her.
Fixed, thanks.
Um, no it’s not. It currently says:
Oh for crying out loud. Please tell me it’s fixed now.
It currently says this:
So, you are a pro-life person who values life over freedom, yah?
Well, I was at the time I wrote the comment. I wrote it specifically to get LW’s opinions on the matter. I am now pro-choice.
Oh, I get it now. Thanks. All confusion cleaned up.
This sounds like: You should read this book, it uses dark arts to persuade you.
I don’t think clearly-marked intuition pumps are automatically Dark Arts, although if they involve a lot of emotional language they can overlap. Thomson rambles but doesn’t cheat.