And canines, yep, I have some, they are sharp & pointy.
Go take down an antelope with only your teeth ;)
What are my other choices in morality besides subjective and objective?
I don’t know. I was really trying to stray away from people arguing how there are no objective morals so killing and everything else is fine. I didn’t want to argue about how there are no objective morals. There aren’t objective morals, so I wanted to talk to people who actually had morals and would be willing to talk of them.
You don’t have to fit into my false dichotomy. You do you.
Teeth are not for killing—I have sharp sticks for that—they are for tearing meat which spent some time over the fire. I can assure my canines function perfectly well in that role :-P
There aren’t objective morals, so I wanted to talk to people who actually had morals
Coherent, you’re not.
But you don’t have to fit into my notions of coherency :-)
That’s my point. You’re cheating now. Lions don’t cheat.
over the fire.
Carnivores can eat raw meat.
I can assure my canines function perfectly well in that role
Nah they work better for plant foods. They aren’t even very sharp. Also, other herbivores have canines but whatever.
Regardless of this bs^ doesn’t matter whether we have canines or not or whether they are useful or not and we both know that. I don’t need to explain the natural fallacy to you.
Coherent, you’re not.
But you don’t have to fit into my notions of coherency :-)
You’re a fuck lol. I responded so nicely acknowledging I screwed up there, whatever.
In the interest of fair disclosure let me point out that I’m not really representative of the LW community.
I hope this a joke. This is low brow even for a response from an average person.
“canine teeth tho”
C’mon, I was expecting more from lesswrong community.
I’m not saying there is objective morality. If you think its subjective, I’m not addressing you here.
So, what’s your prior on the height of my brow? :-D And canines, yep, I have some, they are sharp & pointy.
In the interest of fair disclosure let me point out that I’m not really representative of the LW community.
What are my other choices in morality besides subjective and objective?
Go take down an antelope with only your teeth ;)
I don’t know. I was really trying to stray away from people arguing how there are no objective morals so killing and everything else is fine. I didn’t want to argue about how there are no objective morals. There aren’t objective morals, so I wanted to talk to people who actually had morals and would be willing to talk of them.
You don’t have to fit into my false dichotomy. You do you.
Teeth are not for killing—I have sharp sticks for that—they are for tearing meat which spent some time over the fire. I can assure my canines function perfectly well in that role :-P
Coherent, you’re not.
But you don’t have to fit into my notions of coherency :-)
That’s my point. You’re cheating now. Lions don’t cheat.
Carnivores can eat raw meat.
Nah they work better for plant foods. They aren’t even very sharp. Also, other herbivores have canines but whatever.
Regardless of this bs^ doesn’t matter whether we have canines or not or whether they are useful or not and we both know that. I don’t need to explain the natural fallacy to you.
You’re a fuck lol. I responded so nicely acknowledging I screwed up there, whatever.
Good.
Carnivores—note the vore part—eat meat, how you kill your food is pretty irrelevant.
Yes, my canines can deal with carpaccio very well, thank you.
No, they don’t. That’s what molars are for.
I am sorry, what is the proposition that you are defending?
Coherency. It’s a thing. You should try it sometimes :-P Also, are you missing an adjective in there somewhere?
Yeah — scurvy’s no fun!
Fresh meat (note: fresh) has enough vitamin C to stave off scurvy.
Fair!