if someone made a serious attempt to unpack “systematically”
Since you seem to understand that there’s an equivocation, wouldn’t it be easier to just state up front what the two different meanings are supposed to be?
I’m still not sure what you’re trying to point out here. Can you be more explicit/specific?
Since you seem to understand that there’s an equivocation, wouldn’t it be easier to just state up front what the two different meanings are supposed to be?
I’m still not sure what you’re trying to point out here. Can you be more explicit/specific?