To the convergence to the classical probability, but it doesn’t wash away the quantumness. The quantumness doesn’t go away when you add more quantumness (barring specific setups like interference or spooky action where you’ve carefully created correlations/anti-correlations between the quantum randomness, of course). If I flip 1 classical coin for an expected 0.5 heads, that is less quantum than if I flip 1 classical coin and 1 quantum coin and average, and less quantum than if I clip 1 classical coin and 999 quantum coins and average, even though per CLT the second will be tighter around 0.5 and the third will be much tighter around 0.5.
Sure. Main thing is the election results are about the same, just a list of names of which ‘quantum die rolling organization’ supported candidate A, and who supported B, has many differences.
Or in your coin example, universe 1 might be HHTTHTHT and universe 2 might be THTHHTHT , but the totals are almost the same.
To the convergence to the classical probability, but it doesn’t wash away the quantumness. The quantumness doesn’t go away when you add more quantumness (barring specific setups like interference or spooky action where you’ve carefully created correlations/anti-correlations between the quantum randomness, of course). If I flip 1 classical coin for an expected 0.5 heads, that is less quantum than if I flip 1 classical coin and 1 quantum coin and average, and less quantum than if I clip 1 classical coin and 999 quantum coins and average, even though per CLT the second will be tighter around 0.5 and the third will be much tighter around 0.5.
Sure. Main thing is the election results are about the same, just a list of names of which ‘quantum die rolling organization’ supported candidate A, and who supported B, has many differences.
Or in your coin example, universe 1 might be HHTTHTHT and universe 2 might be THTHHTHT , but the totals are almost the same.