Lol, my professor would give a 100% to anyone who answered every exam question wrong. There were a couple people who pulled it off, but most scored 0<10.
I’m assuming a multiple-choice exam, and invalid answers don’t count as ‘wrong’ for that purpose?
Otherwise I can easily miss the entire exam with “Tau is exactly six.” or “The battle of Thermopylae” repeated for every answer. Even if the valid answers are [A;B;C;D].
I hate to break up the fun, and I’m sure we could keep going on about this, but Decius’s original point was just that giving a wrong answer to an open-ended question is trivially easy. We can play word games and come up with elaborate counter-factuals, but the substance of that point is clearly correct, so maybe we should just move on.
That was exactly the challenge I issued. Granted, it’s trivial to write an answer which is wrong for that question, but it shows that I can’t find a wrong answer for an arbitrary question as easily as I thought I could.
Lol, my professor would give a 100% to anyone who answered every exam question wrong. There were a couple people who pulled it off, but most scored 0<10.
I’m assuming a multiple-choice exam, and invalid answers don’t count as ‘wrong’ for that purpose?
Otherwise I can easily miss the entire exam with “Tau is exactly six.” or “The battle of Thermopylae” repeated for every answer. Even if the valid answers are [A;B;C;D].
Unless it really was the battle of Thermopylae. Not having studied, you wont know.
“The Battle of Thermopylae” is intended as the alternate for questions which might have “Tau is exactly six” as the answer.
For example: “What would be one consequence of a new state law which defines the ratio of a circle’s circumference to diameter as exactly three?”
I bet that you can’t write a question for which “Tau is exactly six.” and “The battle of Thermopylae” are both answers which gain any credit...
“Write a four word phrase or sentence.”
You win.
Judging by this and your previous evil genie comments, you’d make a lovely UFAI.
I hate to break up the fun, and I’m sure we could keep going on about this, but Decius’s original point was just that giving a wrong answer to an open-ended question is trivially easy. We can play word games and come up with elaborate counter-factuals, but the substance of that point is clearly correct, so maybe we should just move on.
That was exactly the challenge I issued. Granted, it’s trivial to write an answer which is wrong for that question, but it shows that I can’t find a wrong answer for an arbitrary question as easily as I thought I could.
“The duel between the current King of France and the former Emperor of Britain”. There, the answer won’t ever be that phrase.
What if you are in a literature class and you’re taking a test about a fiction book you didn’t read?
Care to bet on that?