The desired feature which they have achieved, and you soon will, is to be able to state reasons, debugg opponents and understand different paradigms, as opposed to just thinking that it’s 0 and 1’s all the way down and not being able to say why.
I like and agree with the implication that reading these is needed to defend computationalism, but not needed to believe for correct reasons that computationalism is true.
I like and agree with the implication that reading these is needed to defend computationalism, but not needed to believe for correct reasons that computationalism is true.