Well then, the prototype did have some usefulness.
c) Yes, a shared context and precise definitions are definitely needed. Even then, I worry that there exist important debates that for some fundamental reason would not fit the format. Though I don’t have examples in mind.
b) Just think of it as rationalist twitter (I’m joking). Alternatively, perhaps there could be some additional tool that would help extract a graph of reasoning from text and conversation.
Well then, the prototype did have some usefulness.
c) Yes, a shared context and precise definitions are definitely needed. Even then, I worry that there exist important debates that for some fundamental reason would not fit the format. Though I don’t have examples in mind.
b) Just think of it as rationalist twitter (I’m joking). Alternatively, perhaps there could be some additional tool that would help extract a graph of reasoning from text and conversation.
a) Do you have examples?