I see a lot of mistakes pointed out here, but also a lot of claims about preferences, many contradictory. Are there any plans to A/B test stuff or at least something more rigorous than ‘I agree with X, that blue is too dark’?
Probably not; too expensive.
Oh; I didn’t know your web guys charge extra for that. Never mind then.
BTW everyone, this is the coolest A/B testing tool evar:
http://genetify.com/demo/
(Or it certainly looks like it, I haven’t actually used it.)
From the description, it reads like an ad hoc unmaintained multi-armed bandit.
You make that sound like it’s a bad thing. Are you sure humans are better at multi-armed bandit problems than algorithms?
Are you sure humans are better at multi-armed bandit problems than algorithms?
I’m pretty sure they’re not, which is why I am questioning your enthusiasm for such an ad hoc library.
I see a lot of mistakes pointed out here, but also a lot of claims about preferences, many contradictory. Are there any plans to A/B test stuff or at least something more rigorous than ‘I agree with X, that blue is too dark’?
Probably not; too expensive.
Oh; I didn’t know your web guys charge extra for that. Never mind then.
BTW everyone, this is the coolest A/B testing tool evar:
http://genetify.com/demo/
(Or it certainly looks like it, I haven’t actually used it.)
From the description, it reads like an ad hoc unmaintained multi-armed bandit.
You make that sound like it’s a bad thing. Are you sure humans are better at multi-armed bandit problems than algorithms?
I’m pretty sure they’re not, which is why I am questioning your enthusiasm for such an ad hoc library.