So we got dumber, but more inventive, more creative, and more communicative?
It’s conceivable that most people need less mental resources because a lot of thinking has been outsourced to the infrastructure.
It’s certainly takes less neurological resources to walk on smooth pavement than rough ground.
Could less interpersonal violence mean less need for some mental capacities?
It’s certainly lessened the need to, for example, be able to see a punch coming and avoid it…
I wonder how much driving cars affects the brain? There does seem to be evidence that the brain’s structure changes depending on the demands that are placed on it, and driving a car is a rather unusual cognitive task compared to what people would have been doing in the Paleolithic...
Not just seeing a punch coming in the literal sense, but making strategic choices about odds and allies.
The problem for me with this and other proposed hypotheses is that similar or better ones would equally well explain the reverse effect. So I am still confused after hearing them.
Thus my original question: is the data really well established? Is it confirmed replicated findings of lots of dug out skulls all over the world, or?
So we got dumber, but more inventive, more creative, and more communicative?
It’s conceivable that most people need less mental resources because a lot of thinking has been outsourced to the infrastructure.
It’s certainly takes less neurological resources to walk on smooth pavement than rough ground.
Could less interpersonal violence mean less need for some mental capacities?
It’s certainly lessened the need to, for example, be able to see a punch coming and avoid it…
I wonder how much driving cars affects the brain? There does seem to be evidence that the brain’s structure changes depending on the demands that are placed on it, and driving a car is a rather unusual cognitive task compared to what people would have been doing in the Paleolithic...
Not just seeing a punch coming in the literal sense, but making strategic choices about odds and allies.
The problem for me with this and other proposed hypotheses is that similar or better ones would equally well explain the reverse effect. So I am still confused after hearing them.
Thus my original question: is the data really well established? Is it confirmed replicated findings of lots of dug out skulls all over the world, or?