‘I have discovered that this (post (of mine)) is wrong in important ways’
or
Looking back, this has still stood the test of time.
These methods aren’t necessarily very effective (here).
Arguably, this can be done better by:
Having them be public (likely in text). What you think of your work is also important. (‘This is wrong. I’m leaving it up, but also see this post explaining where I went wrong, etc.’)
I’m confused about why you can agree with your own post. What is that supposed to do?
(I strong-agreed with this post.)
Upvoting/downvoting self
Sorting importance
‘Agreeing’/‘Disagreeing’
‘I have discovered that this (post (of mine)) is wrong in important ways’
or
Looking back, this has still stood the test of time.
These methods aren’t necessarily very effective (here).
Arguably, this can be done better by:
Having them be public (likely in text). What you think of your work is also important. (‘This is wrong. I’m leaving it up, but also see this post explaining where I went wrong, etc.’)
See the top of this article for an example: https://www.gwern.net/Fake-Journal-Club
certainty: log importance: 4
Nothing much. It’s probably the right call to just remove self-agreeing.