I find this interesting in the way that smart people are likely to disagree with the correct interpretation of some of its claims—while others would say the post is worshipping the mysterious, others would say that it’s just making reasonable cautions about the inherent methodological limitations of a certain approach.
And still others, apparently, would say that this post is making an empirically testable claim about how the world works.
And still others, apparently, would say that this post is making an empirically testable claim about how the world works.