We can just Do Something Else Which Is Not Malthusian Trap? Like, have an agreement of not having more than two kids per hundred year per each parent and colonize stars accordingly. I think it will be simple especially after uplifting of major part of humanity.
In relatively hardcore scenarios, we can just migrate into simulations with computation management from benevolent AIs.
We can just Do Something Else Which Is Not Malthusian Trap? Like, have an agreement of not having more than two kids per hundred year per each parent and colonize stars accordingly. I think it will be simple especially after uplifting of major part of humanity.
This agreement falls under interfering with 2.
In relatively hardcore scenarios, we can just migrate into simulations with computation management from benevolent AIs.
That doesn’t solve the problem unless one takes a stance on 2.
We can just Do Something Else Which Is Not Malthusian Trap? Like, have an agreement of not having more than two kids per hundred year per each parent and colonize stars accordingly. I think it will be simple especially after uplifting of major part of humanity.
In relatively hardcore scenarios, we can just migrate into simulations with computation management from benevolent AIs.
This agreement falls under interfering with 2.
That doesn’t solve the problem unless one takes a stance on 2.
It’s not interfering with someone’s freedoms if it is voluntary cooperation?
Ok, but then you haven’t solved the problem for the subset of people who decide they don’t want to cooperate.
Well, it’s a decision theory problem. I recommend “Unifying bargain” by Diffractor.
Maybe I will look at that again at some point in a while.