Oh, come on, it’s an obvious consequence of the premise.
Maybe it would be obvious, were I female.
I’d feel especially silly if there were some trivially implementable noncomputerized version of RSA that someone could tell me about.
Good point. RSA in a nutshell is “I’m the only one who knows a certain secret, and I’m the only one who can unconditionally and repeatedly verify this fact without divulging the secret itself”. Well, this is one half of it, the authentication part, not the encryption part.
So you need a way for a person to produce some output from a given input that can be unique both to the person and to the input. but easily verifiable. What kind of non-technical output is available? Visual? Aural? Motor functions?
For example, maybe a way one’s eyes follow a complicated pattern is while unpredictable, but unique enough and easy to check. Or a rhythm one drums in response to something. Or the interpretation of the Rorschach test.
By the way, if you find something that works in real life, you will be famous and set for life, as this is an open problem with multiple applications.
These people are humans, although there is much more potential for magical alteration of the base plan than real humans have. They have human capacities to memorize and transmit information.
I’m reminded of this. Although the technique in the article was taught using a computer game, one could plausibly develop an analog equivalent. Give someone a musical instrument and teach them to play specific sequences in response to the sequences somebody else plays, or something.
But the teaching would be really time-consuming, and of course you’d have to make sure that the right person was in charge of the body while they were being taught.
If it’s something you can teach children, then wealthy societies (which can afford to wait longer before having people move into each other’s bodies) can be sure to teach only the correct people, but indeed time consumption remains an issue.
Maybe it would be obvious, were I female.
Good point. RSA in a nutshell is “I’m the only one who knows a certain secret, and I’m the only one who can unconditionally and repeatedly verify this fact without divulging the secret itself”. Well, this is one half of it, the authentication part, not the encryption part.
So you need a way for a person to produce some output from a given input that can be unique both to the person and to the input. but easily verifiable. What kind of non-technical output is available? Visual? Aural? Motor functions?
For example, maybe a way one’s eyes follow a complicated pattern is while unpredictable, but unique enough and easy to check. Or a rhythm one drums in response to something. Or the interpretation of the Rorschach test.
By the way, if you find something that works in real life, you will be famous and set for life, as this is an open problem with multiple applications.
These people are humans, although there is much more potential for magical alteration of the base plan than real humans have. They have human capacities to memorize and transmit information.
I’m reminded of this. Although the technique in the article was taught using a computer game, one could plausibly develop an analog equivalent. Give someone a musical instrument and teach them to play specific sequences in response to the sequences somebody else plays, or something.
But the teaching would be really time-consuming, and of course you’d have to make sure that the right person was in charge of the body while they were being taught.
If it’s something you can teach children, then wealthy societies (which can afford to wait longer before having people move into each other’s bodies) can be sure to teach only the correct people, but indeed time consumption remains an issue.