Does the protocol need to be robust against cohabitors in league with each other? That is, is “permanently private” built in, or could someone share their key with a cohabitor who agrees to take the fall?
I think under the circumstances they’re going to have to consider cohabitors who aid and abet their cohabitor’s crimes to be accessories deserving of the same punishment (at least insofar as that punishment is restriction of movement) - otherwise you let the accessory go, they travel to a safe place, and they nap, boom, criminal is free.
Does the protocol need to be robust against cohabitors in league with each other? That is, is “permanently private” built in, or could someone share their key with a cohabitor who agrees to take the fall?
I think under the circumstances they’re going to have to consider cohabitors who aid and abet their cohabitor’s crimes to be accessories deserving of the same punishment (at least insofar as that punishment is restriction of movement) - otherwise you let the accessory go, they travel to a safe place, and they nap, boom, criminal is free.