AspiringKnitter, one of my favorite values on Less Wrong is that people bet things, or are willing to pay money to settle information one way or the other.
To do this definitively here, I’d like a picture of your ergonomic setup. One picture of you (ideally with a shoe or something on your head to prove it is you) in the ergonomic position and setup you were using at the time of this post, and then another one of you in a different ergonomic setup. Obscured personal details is fine, of course.
In exchange, I’ll donate $100 to the charity of your choice. Or I’m actually willing to give it to you if that’s your preference.
I’m sorry to keep engaging you on this, but you faced such serious allegations of trollness that were basically unresolved except by Will’s very vague denial of being you.
I thought your ergonomic setup was such a hilariously bad caricature of everything bad about ergonomics that I found you unlikely. It’s worth it for me to confirm for this community that you are a real person. And $100 is $100, right?
It’s worth it for me to confirm for this community that you are a real person.
I’ll bet US$1000 that AK is a real person… wait, that method of making a point didn’ t work so well last time.
Still, as a step towards broadening the minds of AK skeptics, allow me to mention the possibility that she is semi-real. What if she’s a non-Christian female, here to see how the LW cult responds to a woman who advocates religion and rationality at the same time?
AspiringKnitter, one of my favorite values on Less Wrong is that people bet things, or are willing to pay money to settle information one way or the other.
To do this definitively here, I’d like a picture of your ergonomic setup. One picture of you (ideally with a shoe or something on your head to prove it is you) in the ergonomic position and setup you were using at the time of this post, and then another one of you in a different ergonomic setup. Obscured personal details is fine, of course.
In exchange, I’ll donate $100 to the charity of your choice. Or I’m actually willing to give it to you if that’s your preference.
I’m sorry to keep engaging you on this, but you faced such serious allegations of trollness that were basically unresolved except by Will’s very vague denial of being you.
I thought your ergonomic setup was such a hilariously bad caricature of everything bad about ergonomics that I found you unlikely. It’s worth it for me to confirm for this community that you are a real person. And $100 is $100, right?
I’ll bet US$1000 that AK is a real person… wait, that method of making a point didn’ t work so well last time.
Still, as a step towards broadening the minds of AK skeptics, allow me to mention the possibility that she is semi-real. What if she’s a non-Christian female, here to see how the LW cult responds to a woman who advocates religion and rationality at the same time?