Why don’t these considerations prove that Bayesian epistemology isn’t the true account of knowledge?
Looks to me like you’ve proved that no one can ever change their beliefs or methodology, so not only have you disproven Bayesian epistemology, you’ve managed to disprove everything else too!
Looks to me like you’ve proved that no one can ever change their beliefs or methodology, so not only have you disproven Bayesian epistemology, you’ve managed to disprove everything else too!
Counter example: I changed my epistemology from Aristotelian to Aristotle + Bayes + frequentism.