if the correct theory were more Kolmogorov-complex than SM+GR, then we would still be forced as rationalists to trust SM+GR over the correct theory, because there wouldn’t be enough Bayesian evidence to discriminate the complex-but-correct theory from the countless complex-but-wrong theories.
I reject Solomonoff induction as the correct technical formulation of Occam’s razor, and as an adequate foundation for Bayesian epistemology.
I reject Solomonoff induction as the correct technical formulation of Occam’s razor, and as an adequate foundation for Bayesian epistemology.