What you have there is a defence of the Jaynesian variety, but Yudkowsky is making much stronger claims. For instance he thinks Bayes can replace science, but you can’t replace science with inference alone.
Also, if Bayes is inference alone, it can’t be the sole basis of intelligence.
Bayesian has more than on or meaning.
What you have there is a defence of the Jaynesian variety, but Yudkowsky is making much stronger claims. For instance he thinks Bayes can replace science, but you can’t replace science with inference alone.
Also, if Bayes is inference alone, it can’t be the sole basis of intelligence.