My father told me about someone he knew when he was working as a nurse at a mental hospital, who tried killing himself three times with a gun in the mouth. The first two times he used a pistol of some sort—both times, the bullet passed between the hemispheres of his brain (causing moderate but not fatal brain damage), exited through the back of his head, and all the hot gases from the gun cauterised the wounds.
The third time he used a shotgun, and that did the job. For firearm based suicide, I think above the ear is a safer bet.
The first two times he used a pistol of some sort—both times, the bullet passed between the hemispheres of his brain (causing moderate but not fatal brain damage), exited through the back of his head, and all the hot gases from the gun cauterised the wounds.
Shotgun’s not going to have the problems of a pistol, unless you’re using slugs—and I suspect the hydrostatic shock differential will still do the trick there.
My father told me about someone he knew when he was working as a nurse at a mental hospital, who tried killing himself three times with a gun in the mouth. The first two times he used a pistol of some sort—both times, the bullet passed between the hemispheres of his brain (causing moderate but not fatal brain damage), exited through the back of his head, and all the hot gases from the gun cauterised the wounds.
The third time he used a shotgun, and that did the job. For firearm based suicide, I think above the ear is a safer bet.
There should be a word for that kind of luck.
o.O
Pistol to the mouth seems to require full mouth of water for high chance of success.
Shotgun’s not going to have the problems of a pistol, unless you’re using slugs—and I suspect the hydrostatic shock differential will still do the trick there.