I’d say that true name for fake/real thinking is syntactic thinking vs semantic thinking.
Syntactic thinking—you have bunch of statements-strings and operate with them according to rules.
Semantic thinking—you need to actually create model of what these strings mean, do sanity-check, capture things that are true in model but can’t be expressed by given syntactic rules, etc.
I’d call that one aspect—in particular, quite nearby to what I was trying to capture with “map thinking vs. world thinking” and “rote thinking vs. new thinking.” But doesn’t seem like it captures the whole thing directly.
I’d say that true name for fake/real thinking is syntactic thinking vs semantic thinking.
Syntactic thinking—you have bunch of statements-strings and operate with them according to rules.
Semantic thinking—you need to actually create model of what these strings mean, do sanity-check, capture things that are true in model but can’t be expressed by given syntactic rules, etc.
I’d call that one aspect—in particular, quite nearby to what I was trying to capture with “map thinking vs. world thinking” and “rote thinking vs. new thinking.” But doesn’t seem like it captures the whole thing directly.