Hm. I don’t think this is an (c)omission issue and I don’t really see what does it have to do with morality. What you are describing is what might be called “judge hacking”—modifying entity responsible for determining success so that it declares success regardless of what happens (or, in a bit more general case, changing the success criteria).
Hm. I don’t think this is an (c)omission issue and I don’t really see what does it have to do with morality. What you are describing is what might be called “judge hacking”—modifying entity responsible for determining success so that it declares success regardless of what happens (or, in a bit more general case, changing the success criteria).