I think there is also some path dependence in the legal system.
Imagine that someone sues Google for providing you outputs of some AGPL website in their search results. Almost certainly, Google would win.
Afterwards, the company that runs the link-removing proxy from an AGPL software can try using this as a precedent.
If necessary, more smaller steps can be made, navigating the courts to the desired decisions.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
I think there is also some path dependence in the legal system.
Imagine that someone sues Google for providing you outputs of some AGPL website in their search results. Almost certainly, Google would win.
Afterwards, the company that runs the link-removing proxy from an AGPL software can try using this as a precedent.
If necessary, more smaller steps can be made, navigating the courts to the desired decisions.