You don’t have a point, your reply was just an emotional disagreement. If you have a point I urge you to write it.
Anyway, the broadest definition of a “company” is “an association of persons for carrying on a commercial or industrial enterprise” which agrees with what I wrote. It’s still irrelevant though—you can even start a “Church of Cryonics” and financial problems still apply.
Wow, you’re still wrong and now you’re trying to defend your indefensible made-up definitions despite my citation of the Oxford English Dictionary and calling it an ‘emotional disagreement’.
So fine, I will be blunt: your scenario is ignorant and will not happen as you envision it because for ALCOR alone there is a multi-million dollar trust fund (two of them, actually) plus a 501(c)3 charity charged with taking care of existing cryonics patients, and they do not respond to market incentives like you imagine they will; they will not simply dump the bodies out of the dewars because it is nowhere in their charter or mission and cannot even remotely be construed to be in their charter or mission.
This set-up is well understood, easily discoverable in Google for anyone who bothers to look rather than pontificate on LW, and in fact historically motivated by the Chatsworth disaster where the patients were stored with a for-profit corporation based on ongoing subscription fees and then eventually abandoned. So the current arrangements are literally designed to prevent what you think would happen.
So congratulations: you’ve exhibited Dmytry-like levels of arrogance, failure to do any research, and digging in your heels when someone who knows a little more tells you you’re wrong.
because for ALCOR alone there is a multi-million dollar trust fund (two of them, actually) plus a 501(c)3 charity charged with taking care of existing cryonics patients
Now why couldn’t you just reply with that, alone and in the first reply, instead of raging? And how does the existence of a separate trust fund change the fact that a nonprofit is a still company, just with a different tax scheme? Try responding like an adult next time.
Now why couldn’t you just reply with that, alone and in the first reply, instead of raging?
Because I am tired of people who, after 5 seconds of thought, think they’ve come up with a decisive refutation because apparently they think cyronics people must be idiots and the organizations involved have survived by sheer luck, and can’t be bothered to so much as read a Wikipedia article (the ALCOR Wikipedia article mentions in the infobox the patient trust fund as a source of revenue!).
And how does the existence of a separate trust fund change the fact that a nonprofit is a still company, just with a different tax scheme?
It makes all the difference in the world, as I’ve already explained.
You don’t have a point, your reply was just an emotional disagreement. If you have a point I urge you to write it.
Anyway, the broadest definition of a “company” is “an association of persons for carrying on a commercial or industrial enterprise” which agrees with what I wrote. It’s still irrelevant though—you can even start a “Church of Cryonics” and financial problems still apply.
Wow, you’re still wrong and now you’re trying to defend your indefensible made-up definitions despite my citation of the Oxford English Dictionary and calling it an ‘emotional disagreement’.
So fine, I will be blunt: your scenario is ignorant and will not happen as you envision it because for ALCOR alone there is a multi-million dollar trust fund (two of them, actually) plus a 501(c)3 charity charged with taking care of existing cryonics patients, and they do not respond to market incentives like you imagine they will; they will not simply dump the bodies out of the dewars because it is nowhere in their charter or mission and cannot even remotely be construed to be in their charter or mission.
This set-up is well understood, easily discoverable in Google for anyone who bothers to look rather than pontificate on LW, and in fact historically motivated by the Chatsworth disaster where the patients were stored with a for-profit corporation based on ongoing subscription fees and then eventually abandoned. So the current arrangements are literally designed to prevent what you think would happen.
So congratulations: you’ve exhibited Dmytry-like levels of arrogance, failure to do any research, and digging in your heels when someone who knows a little more tells you you’re wrong.
Now why couldn’t you just reply with that, alone and in the first reply, instead of raging? And how does the existence of a separate trust fund change the fact that a nonprofit is a still company, just with a different tax scheme? Try responding like an adult next time.
Because I am tired of people who, after 5 seconds of thought, think they’ve come up with a decisive refutation because apparently they think cyronics people must be idiots and the organizations involved have survived by sheer luck, and can’t be bothered to so much as read a Wikipedia article (the ALCOR Wikipedia article mentions in the infobox the patient trust fund as a source of revenue!).
It makes all the difference in the world, as I’ve already explained.