Anchovies have to die to make anchovy pizza, so depending on who you talk to it might still be immoral to eat anchovy pizza even if you want to.
There is not always a clear cut case that is best for every one, and part of morality is weighing the wants and needs of one being verses another in such cases.
morality is another one of those things that is true in the sense of consensus, which is a different meaning of truth from mathematical truth, or physical truth.
In the prisoners dilemma it is always advantageous to speak when the other player’s action is fixed.
If you get to be both players and decide what both players do then it is adventurous to make both players not speak. Morality amounts to getting to be both players.
In some other cases there may be multiple reasonable options to choose when you control all players involved, possibly depending on how you weigh the wants and needs of the players, and as such multiple reasonable conflicting moralities.
Anchovy pizza is a good example. You have to weigh a delicious meal for a human against killing fish.
Obert: “In some ways the human species itself strikes me as being a sort of toddler in the ‘No!’ stage.”
I am interested to know why.
Anchovies have to die to make anchovy pizza, so depending on who you talk to it might still be immoral to eat anchovy pizza even if you want to.
There is not always a clear cut case that is best for every one, and part of morality is weighing the wants and needs of one being verses another in such cases.
morality is another one of those things that is true in the sense of consensus, which is a different meaning of truth from mathematical truth, or physical truth.
In the prisoners dilemma it is always advantageous to speak when the other player’s action is fixed. If you get to be both players and decide what both players do then it is adventurous to make both players not speak. Morality amounts to getting to be both players.
In some other cases there may be multiple reasonable options to choose when you control all players involved, possibly depending on how you weigh the wants and needs of the players, and as such multiple reasonable conflicting moralities.
Anchovy pizza is a good example. You have to weigh a delicious meal for a human against killing fish.
Obert: “In some ways the human species itself strikes me as being a sort of toddler in the ‘No!’ stage.” I am interested to know why.