inverse, with whatever relativistic corrections you would know that I woudn’t
I am not clear on that cube thing, actually.
What? is gravity not inverse quadratic?
Yes, the Newtonian force a mass exerts on another mass far away from the first one falls off as the square of the distance. It’s the word “cube” that confuses me.
I think the quote was an image for a mental question, which could be rephrased as:
Is this power a 2 or a 3?
2, but his original statement was 2x3 :)
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
inverse, with whatever relativistic corrections you would know that I woudn’t
I am not clear on that cube thing, actually.
What? is gravity not inverse quadratic?
Yes, the Newtonian force a mass exerts on another mass far away from the first one falls off as the square of the distance. It’s the word “cube” that confuses me.
I think the quote was an image for a mental question, which could be rephrased as:
Is this power a 2 or a 3?
2, but his original statement was 2x3 :)