Although I see where you talk about calibration and choices between revision and replacement of hypothesis, I did not learn anything new about these subjects from the post.
Fair criticism. It’s hard to know what the quality threshold for posting should be. Ideally bad posts would net negative karma for feedback purposes but people are unfortunately reluctant to downvote.
Although I see where you talk about calibration and choices between revision and replacement of hypothesis, I did not learn anything new about these subjects from the post.
Fair criticism. It’s hard to know what the quality threshold for posting should be. Ideally bad posts would net negative karma for feedback purposes but people are unfortunately reluctant to downvote.