.
For what it’s worth, I greatly enjoy Eliezer’s style, and usually find him quite clear and understandable (except maybe some older texts like the intuitive explanantion of Bayes and the technical explanation of technical explanations).
If you and/or atucker could remedy this, I’d be much obliged. You guys are super readable.
I’m flattered that you think so, and to be mentioned in the same sentence as lukeprog.
Out of a mixture of a desire to help and curiosity (probably along with a dash of vanity), what comments have you found particularly readable?
That would actually help me a lot in improving my writing style.
Presumably, Eliezer’s upcoming book would do the same.
.
For what it’s worth, I greatly enjoy Eliezer’s style, and usually find him quite clear and understandable (except maybe some older texts like the intuitive explanantion of Bayes and the technical explanation of technical explanations).
.
I’m flattered that you think so, and to be mentioned in the same sentence as lukeprog.
Out of a mixture of a desire to help and curiosity (probably along with a dash of vanity), what comments have you found particularly readable?
That would actually help me a lot in improving my writing style.
.
Presumably, Eliezer’s upcoming book would do the same.