Um, I want to reserve the right to judge differently than lc, if I disagree with them about e.g. whether something turned out negative. I don’t particularly expect that to happen, but just in case.
Actually it would be interesting to have a systematic way to pledge.
It would be a great way to incentivize actions and research in a domain.
I am thinking of a system like petition or reverse crowdfunding.
Maybe it could be easier enforced by smart contracts, without the need for a central authority in which in the trust would need to resign.
If you already know a system like this or if you have any idea on how to design solutions for the first problems I encountered by thinking about it for two minutes, please don’t hesitate to give me your input.
I will also match this bounty, and encourage others to do the same.
I pledge to match the bounty of the next person to pledge $5,000, because of research showing this encourages people to donate money.
So if someone else pledges, we’ve reached a third of the median US salary.
I pledge to match the bounty with $500.
I’ll add $5,000 to the pot.
Um, I want to reserve the right to judge differently than lc, if I disagree with them about e.g. whether something turned out negative. I don’t particularly expect that to happen, but just in case.
Actually it would be interesting to have a systematic way to pledge.
It would be a great way to incentivize actions and research in a domain. I am thinking of a system like petition or reverse crowdfunding. Maybe it could be easier enforced by smart contracts, without the need for a central authority in which in the trust would need to resign.
If you already know a system like this or if you have any idea on how to design solutions for the first problems I encountered by thinking about it for two minutes, please don’t hesitate to give me your input.
It sounds like a good idea, so I wouldn’t be surprised if it already exists.