Perhaps the lesson is that terminology that is acceptable in one field (in this case philosophy) might not be suitable in another (in this case machine learning).
I don’t think that even philosophers take the “genie” terminology very seriously. I think the more general lesson is something like: it’s particularly important to spend your weirdness points wisely when you want others to copy you, because they may be less willing to spend weirdness points.
Perhaps the lesson is that terminology that is acceptable in one field (in this case philosophy) might not be suitable in another (in this case machine learning).
I don’t think that even philosophers take the “genie” terminology very seriously. I think the more general lesson is something like: it’s particularly important to spend your weirdness points wisely when you want others to copy you, because they may be less willing to spend weirdness points.