“good”, “evil” and “responsibility” are terms that are hard to agree on a definition.
A fact that everyone should agree on is that each event has multiple causes, defined as previous events that are necessary for the event to happen. In the case of a person’s behaviour, some causes are internal and others are external. What is relevant depends on what you can leverage. I don’t see how saying “some people are good, some are just evil” can be leveraged to reduce bullying. But I believe making school less prison-like would.
Also, an “unconstrained wild west environment” is neither a common nor natural environment. Humans have evolved to live in a network of constraining but flexible relationships, personal debts and cultural items.
So you think that between two theories—“evil comes from people’s choices” and “evil comes from circumstances”—the former can’t be “leveraged” and we should adopt the latter apriori, regardless of which one is closer to truth? I think that’s jumping the gun a bit. Let’s figure out what’s true first, then make decisions based on that.
“good”, “evil” and “responsibility” are terms that are hard to agree on a definition.
A fact that everyone should agree on is that each event has multiple causes, defined as previous events that are necessary for the event to happen. In the case of a person’s behaviour, some causes are internal and others are external. What is relevant depends on what you can leverage. I don’t see how saying “some people are good, some are just evil” can be leveraged to reduce bullying. But I believe making school less prison-like would.
Also, an “unconstrained wild west environment” is neither a common nor natural environment. Humans have evolved to live in a network of constraining but flexible relationships, personal debts and cultural items.
So you think that between two theories—“evil comes from people’s choices” and “evil comes from circumstances”—the former can’t be “leveraged” and we should adopt the latter apriori, regardless of which one is closer to truth? I think that’s jumping the gun a bit. Let’s figure out what’s true first, then make decisions based on that.