I’m familiar with it anyway. The point is that things like history, prvenance and cultural
significance are built into the way we think about things, part of the connotational cloud. That doesn;t contradict QM, but it does schemes to lossllessly reduce meaning to physics.
A duplicate of the Mona Lisa wouldn’t be the Mona Lisa.
Have you read the quantum physics sequence? Are you familiar with the experimental evidence on particle indistinguishability?
I’m familiar with it anyway. The point is that things like history, prvenance and cultural significance are built into the way we think about things, part of the connotational cloud. That doesn;t contradict QM, but it does schemes to lossllessly reduce meaning to physics.