All life runs on DNA in particular. Scientists have added extra base pairs and made life forms that work fine. Evolution didn’t. DNA is a fairly arbitrary molecule amongst a larger set of similar double chain organics.
I think this post is just dismissing everything with weak reasons. I don’t think this post is evidence at all, by conservation of expected evidence, we should take an unusually bad argument against a position as evidence for that position.
If nanotech really was impossible, it’s likely that better impossibility arguments would exist.
All life runs on DNA in particular. Scientists have added extra base pairs and made life forms that work fine. Evolution didn’t. DNA is a fairly arbitrary molecule amongst a larger set of similar double chain organics.
I think this post is just dismissing everything with weak reasons. I don’t think this post is evidence at all, by conservation of expected evidence, we should take an unusually bad argument against a position as evidence for that position.
If nanotech really was impossible, it’s likely that better impossibility arguments would exist.