His gratuitous imposition of his own moral assumptions are worse.
I don’t see the problem with moral assumptions, as long as they are clear and relevant. I think generally the myside effect is a force that stands against truth-seeking—I guess its a question of definition whether you consider that to be irrational or not. People that bend the truth to suit themselves distort the information that rational people use for decision making, so I think its relevant.
There’s not a problem if he is aware of the dependency on his moral premises and discloses that dependency to his readers. I don’t see evidence of either.
The lack of an “unretract” feature is annoying.
Yeah. Interesting that in my inbox, it is not showing as retracted.
Yeah I think you’re right on that one. Still, I like and share his moral assumption that my-side-ism is harmful because it distorts and is often opposed to the truth in communication.
I retracted an earlier incorrect assertion and then edited to make this one instead. Not sure how that works exactly...
I don’t see the problem with moral assumptions, as long as they are clear and relevant. I think generally the myside effect is a force that stands against truth-seeking—I guess its a question of definition whether you consider that to be irrational or not. People that bend the truth to suit themselves distort the information that rational people use for decision making, so I think its relevant.
*The lack of an “unretract” feature is annoying.
There’s not a problem if he is aware of the dependency on his moral premises and discloses that dependency to his readers. I don’t see evidence of either.
Yeah. Interesting that in my inbox, it is not showing as retracted.
Yeah I think you’re right on that one. Still, I like and share his moral assumption that my-side-ism is harmful because it distorts and is often opposed to the truth in communication.
I retracted an earlier incorrect assertion and then edited to make this one instead. Not sure how that works exactly...