So, what are your meta-arguments for going with one side or the other for any given controversial subject on which you have an opinion?
If you think that the issue is too close to decisively call one way or the other, it would make sense to lobby for the position with the least backing, in order to provide more balance to the argument.
If you think that the issue is too close to decisively call one way or the other, it would make sense to lobby for the position with the least backing, in order to provide more balance to the argument.