The fact that we can’t fully explain consciousness is a point in favour of the HP.
But my question was, what exactly can’t we fully explain? What are you referring to when you say “consciousness” and what about it can’t we explain?
they have arguments you haven’t addressed.
Such as?
I use the criterion of being able to make novel predictions. We clearly don’t have a solution that reaches that criterion.
Agreed, but what exactly should it predict? General relativity made novel predictions when it was first formulated, but about the movement of planets and so forth, so I presume that doesn’t count as a solution to the Hard Problem of consciousness.
But my question was, what exactly can’t we fully explain? What are you referring to when you say “consciousness” and what about it can’t we explain?
Such as?
Agreed, but what exactly should it predict? General relativity made novel predictions when it was first formulated, but about the movement of planets and so forth, so I presume that doesn’t count as a solution to the Hard Problem of consciousness.
Hard problem stuff?