If a statement is false, that’s the worst thing you can say about it. You don’t need to say it’s heretical. And if it isn’t false, it shouldn’t be suppressed.
I like the sentiment. I disagree that it is (always) the worst you can say about it. And there are also true things that are actively constructed to be misleading—I certainly go about suppressing those where possible and plan to continue.
I like the sentiment. I disagree that it is (always) the worst you can say about it. And there are also true things that are actively constructed to be misleading—I certainly go about suppressing those where possible and plan to continue.
Wouldn’t explaining why the statement is misleading be more productive than suppressing the misleading statement?