done in an exceptionally rational way, such that if it is flawed, it will be very clear why
That standard sounds pretty weird. If it is so clear that it is flawed, wouldn’t you expect it to be clear to the author and thus not posted? Perhaps you mean clear what your core disagreement is?
That standard sounds pretty weird. If it is so clear that it is flawed, wouldn’t you expect it to be clear to the author and thus not posted? Perhaps you mean clear what your core disagreement is?