Does augmentation sound better or worse than other methods here? Should we lean more toward or against developing brain emulations before synthetic AI after thinking about these issues?
WBE is not necessarily the starting point for augmentation. A safe AI path should avoid the slippery slope of self-improvement. An engineered AI with years of testing could be a safer starting point to augmentation because its value and safeguard system is traceable—what is impossible to a WBE. Other methods have to be implemented prior to starting augmentation.
Augmentation starting from WBE of a decent human character could end in a treacherous turn. We know from brain injuries that character can change dramatically. The extra abilities offered by extending WBE capabilities could destabilize mental control processes.
Summarizing: Augmentation is no alternative to other methods. Augmentation as singular method is riskier and therefore worse than others.
The human mind is very sensitive to small modification in it’s constituent parts. Up to a third of USA inmates have some sort of neurological condition that undermines the functioning of their frontal cortexes or amigdalas.
It is utmost important to realize how much easier an unpredictable modification would be in a virtual world—both because the simulation may be imperfect, and it’s imperfections have cumulative effects, or because the augmentation itself changes the Markov network structures in such a way that brain-tumoresque behavior emerges.
Does augmentation sound better or worse than other methods here? Should we lean more toward or against developing brain emulations before synthetic AI after thinking about these issues?
WBE is not necessarily the starting point for augmentation. A safe AI path should avoid the slippery slope of self-improvement. An engineered AI with years of testing could be a safer starting point to augmentation because its value and safeguard system is traceable—what is impossible to a WBE. Other methods have to be implemented prior to starting augmentation.
Augmentation starting from WBE of a decent human character could end in a treacherous turn. We know from brain injuries that character can change dramatically. The extra abilities offered by extending WBE capabilities could destabilize mental control processes.
Summarizing: Augmentation is no alternative to other methods. Augmentation as singular method is riskier and therefore worse than others.
The human mind is very sensitive to small modification in it’s constituent parts. Up to a third of USA inmates have some sort of neurological condition that undermines the functioning of their frontal cortexes or amigdalas.
It is utmost important to realize how much easier an unpredictable modification would be in a virtual world—both because the simulation may be imperfect, and it’s imperfections have cumulative effects, or because the augmentation itself changes the Markov network structures in such a way that brain-tumoresque behavior emerges.