ongoing, publicized debate between evolution and creationism, which is analogous to analytic vs. continental philosophy
I guess I fail to see an analogy between a debate between two factions in what is supposedly a science and that of science vs religion. In the latter case, it is easy to tell who the loony is, while in the former the only conclusion I can make is that they both are.
I guess I fail to see an analogy between a debate between two factions in what is supposedly a science and that of science vs religion. In the latter case, it is easy to tell who the loony is, while in the former the only conclusion I can make is that they both are.
What’s your algorithm for telling who the loony is? Look for the one not wearing a lab coat?
I didn’t say anything about my method of telling the looney. My point was that your method of telling the looney seems to boil down to who has high status/is wearing a lab coat.
I guess I fail to see an analogy between a debate between two factions in what is supposedly a science and that of science vs religion. In the latter case, it is easy to tell who the loony is, while in the former the only conclusion I can make is that they both are.
What’s your algorithm for telling who the loony is? Look for the one not wearing a lab coat?
Hmm, if you need help figuring out who the loony is in the evolution/creation debate, this comment thread is not the place to set things straight.
I didn’t say anything about my method of telling the looney. My point was that your method of telling the looney seems to boil down to who has high status/is wearing a lab coat.