Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism? Both, for different types of knowledge.
Knowledge claims: invariantism (although contextualism may have some points)
Laws of nature: Humean or non-Humean? I wasn’t able to find a concise summary of what this means.
Logic: classical (with Baysean probability theory, which is derived from classical logic and mathematics, applicable in most cases dealing with non-mathematical objects)
Mental content: internalism or externalism? I can’t figure out what this means.
Meta-ethics: moral realism
Metaphilosophy: probably naturalism
Mind: not sure
Moral judgment: cognitivism
Moral motivation: internalism or externalism? I can’t figure out what this means
Newcomb’s problem: one box
Normative ethics: something like consequential virtue ethics
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism, or sense-datum theory? These all seem to be talking about different things.
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view, or further-fact view? Probably further-fact view if it means what I’m guessing it means.
Politics: libertarianism
Proper names: Millian, to the extend this question is at all meaningful
Science: scientific realism (subject to the constrain that our current theories, at least, are as wrong as Newtonian physics)
Teletransporter (new matter): not sure
Time: A-theory or B-theory? This is at best a question of definitions and not a philosophical question.
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): probably switch but with strong caveats
Truth: probably correspondence
Zombies: conceivable possibly metaphysically possible
===
Philisophers: Locke, to a certain extent Mill and maybe Quine (I don’t know enough about him to be sure).
A priori knowledge: yes for mathematics (and possibly priors) only.
Abstract objects: Platonism
Aesthetic value: subjectively objective
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes, math is analytic, everything else is synthetic
Epistemic justification: externalism
External world: it exists, I assume that’s non-skeptical realism
Free will: leaning towards compatibilism
God: Intersubjectively true
Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism? Both, for different types of knowledge.
Knowledge claims: invariantism (although contextualism may have some points)
Laws of nature: Humean or non-Humean? I wasn’t able to find a concise summary of what this means.
Logic: classical (with Baysean probability theory, which is derived from classical logic and mathematics, applicable in most cases dealing with non-mathematical objects)
Mental content: internalism or externalism? I can’t figure out what this means.
Meta-ethics: moral realism
Metaphilosophy: probably naturalism
Mind: not sure
Moral judgment: cognitivism
Moral motivation: internalism or externalism? I can’t figure out what this means
Newcomb’s problem: one box
Normative ethics: something like consequential virtue ethics
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism, or sense-datum theory? These all seem to be talking about different things.
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view, or further-fact view? Probably further-fact view if it means what I’m guessing it means.
Politics: libertarianism
Proper names: Millian, to the extend this question is at all meaningful
Science: scientific realism (subject to the constrain that our current theories, at least, are as wrong as Newtonian physics)
Teletransporter (new matter): not sure
Time: A-theory or B-theory? This is at best a question of definitions and not a philosophical question.
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): probably switch but with strong caveats
Truth: probably correspondence
Zombies: conceivable possibly metaphysically possible
===
Philisophers: Locke, to a certain extent Mill and maybe Quine (I don’t know enough about him to be sure).