So I moved towards reading all of my sources deeply, even if my selection was inspired by a particular book’s particular claim.
The evolution of the process makes sense, but I’m curious if it still makes much sense to call it an “epistemic spot check” if that’s the case?
Not really, but what it’s going to become isn’t clear yet and I want to limit the number of name changes.
Nod
The evolution of the process makes sense, but I’m curious if it still makes much sense to call it an “epistemic spot check” if that’s the case?
Not really, but what it’s going to become isn’t clear yet and I want to limit the number of name changes.
Nod