I’m curious. Were you agreeing with the quote (and thus dissing cryonics), disagreeing with the quote (and bringing cryonics as a counterexample), or genuinely without agenda?
Partly that second one, partly just curious if it was an intended subject.
The original context is that Scott Locklin is a nanotechnology skeptic.
I’m curious. Were you agreeing with the quote (and thus dissing cryonics), disagreeing with the quote (and bringing cryonics as a counterexample), or genuinely without agenda?
Partly that second one, partly just curious if it was an intended subject.
The original context is that Scott Locklin is a nanotechnology skeptic.