while what you say is true for the gravitational event horizon of black holes, it doesn’t apply to the cryptographic event horizon of HECs or the expansion-of-the-universe event horizon of our ligth cone. so, yes, some cases of event horizons may not be livable, others might still matter — including potentially yet unknown unknown ones.
to you. i understand your comment as “this kind of thing wouldn’t really be a question with black holes” and i’m saying “maybe, sure, but there are other event horizons to which it might apply too”
Huh, I did not think of myself as at all making any positive claims about black holes (edit: and definitely did not mean to be making any claims at all about cryptographic event horizons one way or the other)
(maybe to clarify: my comment was definitely a digression that ignored the main part of your post, and I meant to flag it as such with the phrase “random aside.”)
while what you say is true for the gravitational event horizon of black holes, it doesn’t apply to the cryptographic event horizon of HECs or the expansion-of-the-universe event horizon of our ligth cone. so, yes, some cases of event horizons may not be livable, others might still matter — including potentially yet unknown unknown ones.
Was this meant to be a reply to me or one of the child comments?
to you. i understand your comment as “this kind of thing wouldn’t really be a question with black holes” and i’m saying “maybe, sure, but there are other event horizons to which it might apply too”
Huh, I did not think of myself as at all making any positive claims about black holes (edit: and definitely did not mean to be making any claims at all about cryptographic event horizons one way or the other)
(maybe to clarify: my comment was definitely a digression that ignored the main part of your post, and I meant to flag it as such with the phrase “random aside.”)
oops, i missed that flag. sorry.